February 2016 update -
Proposed rule: Labor
Department proposes to hold retirement investment advisers to a fiduciary
standard, forcing them to avoid conflicts of interest that include sales based
on commission and sales performance compensation.
Assuming the rule is added to the law books, variable
annuity issuers will likely find themselves shifting from paying out upfront
commissions (around 8%) to returns on investor paid on-going fees. The rule would
affect large insurance companies such as MetLife, Prudential, and Lincoln
National; smaller brokerages and advisers are similarly impacted. Industry wide
concerns are the entire variable annuity retirement savings sector will be
thrown into flux for the first year. Sales of variable based annuities have
been close to $140 billion per year recently. More than half of these sales are
attributed to retirement savings accounts.
Experts indicate variable annuities with guaranteed lifetime
benefits are extremely complicated products and should be sold with caution. In
recent years, high commissions on variable annuity investments have pushed
advisers and insurance agents to sell the products even where the annuity may
not be best suited for the investor. The result - regulators are issuing
consumer advisories and taking increased regulation under their wing.
Members of the financial industry threaten legal challenge
once the final rule is in place. The change is huge for the annuity industry
and some sellers may avoid the products going forward because of lower upfront
compensation. Many advisers believe upfront commissions should remain the
standard for variable annuities because most of the adviser work is done in the
beginning when establishing the account. Others cite, the restrictions create an
imbalance and disservice to consumers who benefit from annuities; and that the
industry is already highly regulated.
The proposed rule by the Department of Labor is designed to
reduce conflicts of interest by requiring brokers working with retirement funds
to act in the client’s best interest. Retirement vehicles with annual fees of
3-4% and a surrender charge of 7% (or more) is too often recommended as the
best retirement vehicle; and often results is retirees who own high-fee
products that erode retirement savings.
With the proposed rule back on the table and likely to pass,
brokers and insurance agents will be pressed to update conflict of interest
policies and procedures. FINRA focus on
senior and vulnerable investors has increased over the past years. In 2016
FINRA plans to make treatment of senior investors a priority and urges firms to
monitor investor accounts for red flags like; overly aggressive investments,
unusual asset movements, and an unusual number of high cost products driving
unsuitable recommendations.
April 2015 FINRA launched a Securities Helpline for Seniors (HELPS) and a toll-free number where senior investors can call and get assistance
about their brokerage accounts or raise concerns. Armed with information from
over 2500 calls, FINRA released an end of year report on effective practices
brokers and investors can take to
establish a healthy working relationship that provides for the best interests
of the investor as well as a suitable role for the broker.
What do you think? Are these updates way overdue or right on
time?
RND Resources Inc is a compliance and audit consulting firm
serving broker-dealers, investment advisory firms, and fund managers. We provide on-going compliance maintenance for
firms as well as; #forensicanalysis, #mockaudits, #expertwitnesstestimony, suitability
analysis, and custody compliance for securities regulated firms. Call #RNDResourcesInc for support (818) 657-0288 or visit our website at www.finracompliance.com
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your comments are welcome: